PDA

View Full Version : Doyle Shields Interview



admin
05-06-2004, 06:20 PM
This interview was copied from the Shields For Sheriff (http://www.shieldsforsheriff.com/) website.


Question: Why are you running for Newton County Sheriff?

Answer: I feel there is a need for a directional change from the current way the Newton County Sheriff's Office is being managed. Numerous citizens from both the Republican and Democrat parties throughout Newton County have commented about the need for a change. I believe that I have a different approach to Law Enforcement management than the current administration and would like the opportunity to put my ideas to work for the citizens of the county.

Question: What do you mean by "different approach"?

Answer: The current administration has fostered the perception to the citizens of Newton County that response is based on "citizen status". For example - where one resides - the current perception is that a crime being committed in certain parts of the county have a higher priority than others i.e., south Joplin vs. say Fairview." Secondly the "type or degree of the crime occurring - example - drug crimes vs. a burglary or a property crime." It is easy to see that there is a drug problem in the county as well as the whole country and these crimes cannot go unattended; however, there are other crimes occurring as well that seem to the public to be placed on the back burner and the citizenry of Newton County do not like the feeling of being made to wait for a response from law enforcement. Drug crimes tend to make the news whenever they happen, but when was the last time you remember a burglary or stolen farm implement being reported on the local news? The perception is that one crime is more important than the other. Whether a real problem or not, if the citizens perceive this as a problem then it is indeed a problem. My solution is to make every crime a priority, even if it requires having my supervisory staff answer calls for service. I too, will respond to calls for service should my deputies be busy or tied up on other calls? I will not ask my deputies to do anything that I wouldn't do myself. My commitment is to be there personally for the citizens of Newton County.

Question: It seems that you jumped ahead of the other candidates by placing signs around the county early last year - what prompted this?

Answer: A group of Newton County concerned citizens approached me with a request to see what input would return from placing the "Shields - just think about it" signs out early. We did not anticipate the number of contacts that encouraged me to run for the Sheriff's position. Ultimately, running was a decision that my family all felt was the right thing to do. I just trust that the good Lord will use my talents in a manner which I can serve the citizens of Newton County.

Question: What changes, if any, will you make within the department if elected?

Answer: Fundamentally, the current organization needs to be analyzed for accountability and cost effectiveness. Each division, patrol, investigation, jail etc., needs to be reviewed for effectiveness by the incoming Sheriff. Not to do so would render the new Sheriff incompetent. My first order of business will be to surround myself with tried and proven law enforcement supervisors and administrators. It certainly is in the best interest of the county for the newly elected Sheriff to have personnel who share his or her philosophy. As for an overall immediate change, this will only occur following a complete evaluation of the effectiveness of each division and down the line to the officers themselves. Who ever is elected cannot be effective in the position without total support from his or her staff.

Question: What are some of your goals if elected?

Answer: First, to assure the citizens of Newton County that they have a voice and that their voice will be heard. Each and every citizen will have the same level of protection and service from my officers. Secondly, response times seem to be an issue at present. My plan is to conduct a thorough assessment of past patrol activities, by looking at how long it has taken officers to arrive and what, if any, follow-up actions were initiated. By reducing response times as well as assigning more deputies to patrol the public will have a better feeling towards the Newton County Sheriffs Office. Another goal will be to evaluate how the jail is operated. There have been reoccurring problems within the jail during the past administration. As you should be well aware, jail management is the largest "thorn" for any Sheriff. This is the area where most of the lawsuits are originated. From inmates claiming violation of rights to lousy food these all prompt lawsuits towards the Sheriff and the County. I feel that one of the best ways to alleviate these lawsuits is to reduce the boredom and stress on the inmate population by introducing a program of road crews for those inmates who pose minimal risks to the public. This program could assist both the County and State Road Districts with personnel to clean ditches and patch roads within our county. It's my belief that occupied individuals that have a sense of worth are far easier to manage than those who remain idle for hours upon end. Other avenues of work could be added if this initial program proves successful. It certainly has worked in other Counties across the State.

Question: What makes you the BEST candidate of those running?

Answer: First, let me say that every candidate running has something to offer to the citizens of Newton County. My strength lies in the fact that I'm the only candidate who has filled a law enforcement position as a department head. My experience as a department head has allowed me to be the final stopping place for the decision making processes. I'll give you an example - I've not only been in on the planning stages of a budget formation, but I have had the sole responsibility for the execution of that budget. And ultimately, I have been the final accountability for the management of these budgets. It has all rested upon my shoulders. I don't believe that any of the other candidates can say that they have had this level of responsibility and/or accountability in their law enforcement careers. One must keep in mind that I'm not a career politician - I'm just a 28 year law enforcement veteran. I don't have a traditional family name with which to base my political career nor have I had any relatives to my knowledge that have held any elected offices. I run as a veteran law enforcement officer who has dedicated the majority of my adult life to the service and protection of citizens of Newton County. I have served as a field deputy for the Newton County Sheriff's office. I held a Lieutenants position with the Neosho Police Department as the Patrol Division Commander. And I have been a former Administrator for the Newton County Ambulance District. I now serve the citizens of Seneca as their Chief of Police, a position I have held for the past eight years. I wish to succeed as the next Sheriff and I look forward to the opportunity to serve the all the citizens of Newton County.

lexi2
05-13-2004, 09:54 AM
Concerning the candidates having a debate, I'm going to quote Doyle Shields.

"He's (Doyle) talked to Mike, Steven, and Ken and none of them want to debate because they are all friends. They all want to be able to work together after the election."

barneyfife
05-13-2004, 02:54 PM
Hi this is Barny Fife,

You have to consider the man has served 28 yrs in law enforcement and 6 yrs experience in the Marine's. The man really knows his stuff. He has a proffessional and personal way of dealing with people and their issues. He has helped me and my family on a few occasions and is alway very intuitive and fair no matter what the situation.



So take some time to consider and vote for DOYLE SHIELDS for Sheriff.



thank you
Barny Fife

05-13-2004, 03:06 PM
Hey Barney,
I thought you retired. You are correct, Mr Shields would made a fine "Andy Griffith" ( but with a gun) and the Shields interview was excellent. However, I am voting for Mike Langland.

barneyfife
05-13-2004, 03:19 PM
I have heard some good things about Mike but i would say Doyle is more Qualified for the job just think about it .

windtalker
05-13-2004, 03:27 PM
I think we are all entitled, to pick who we want.

barneyfife
05-13-2004, 03:37 PM
your absolutly right we all have the right to vote who we want but i am just expressing my thoughts on the subject. we need to get more people to vote.

Scutter
05-13-2004, 03:38 PM
Hello and welcome Barney. I think we have all thought about it Barney, and I have decided to support Steven Douglas and I am sure other people have given a lot of thought to the candidate they are supporting. We have already been through the page upon page of people trying to change the member's minds about who they are supporting and it does get pretty repetitious. So let us all just say we are supporting the right candidate and settle the issue at the polls.

lexi2
05-14-2004, 02:05 PM
Originally posted by Scutter
We have already been through the page upon page of people trying to change the member's minds about who they are supporting and it does get pretty repetitious. So let us all just say we are supporting the right candidate and settle the issue at the polls.

Scutter, maybe some new members haven't read all the pages of political B.S. on the forums. Maybe this thread impressed Barney and he felt the desire to post. Do you think it's fair to discourage anyone from posting their opinion even if YOU think it's repetitious?
I also didn't get the impression Barney was tying to change anyone's mind.

Scutter
05-14-2004, 02:31 PM
You have a very valid point Lexi, and I stand corrected.

lexi2
05-14-2004, 02:59 PM
Thank you Scutter.

Now, I do think Barney made a good point, we should encourage people to exercise their right to vote no matter who their choice of candidate may be......so many people don't vote and it's a priviledge this country offers almost everyone.

LARRY
07-18-2004, 12:02 AM
welcome barneyfife

Littleone
07-18-2004, 12:14 PM
This thread seems to have been dead for over 2 months. What happened all the sudden?

By the way, on the issue of the candidates for sheriff....Does it not matter to anyone who has the qualifications for the job? It is sad to me that a person could become the sheriff of a soon to be "First Class" county based on popularity instead of their qualifications. If the sheriff's position were a hired position we all know who would have the job hands down.

It shouldn't matter who has the most money, the well known name or who is the best politician. It should be about who can do the best job for Newton County! Maybe this is what we need to think about before going to the polls on August 3rd.

Scutter
07-18-2004, 02:22 PM
All of the candidates are qualified to hold that job Little One and I do not see that your candidate is any more or less qualified than any of the other candidates. When you get into the area of a resume, you get into a very murky area of subjective interpretation. What a person has listed as a history of qualifications does not necessarily indicate how well he performed in that position listed. We all have made our decision by this time and we will be guided by that decision.

Littleone
07-19-2004, 12:36 AM
Due to the fact that I didn't direct this response to you Scutter I don't feel bad. I told you I would not bug you about your choice and I have kept my promise. Why you responded to my response to Larry is your problem....thanks for your time.