Our Stats Are Down

[admin]

We are only getting 9,000 - 10,000 page views per day... What gives? I know we are still the leading media source in town, but we are losing numbers... And I want to know why!

[kay9_medic]

It is the internet after all

[RealityCheck]

Originally posted by admin
We are only getting 9,000 - 10,000 page views per day... What gives? I know we are still the leading media source in town, but we are losing numbers... And I want to know why!

Don't fret that your numbers are down, because you are not the leading media source in town. You mostly don't get it. The Neosho Forums should have stayed Neosho Sucks because that is the theme of this forum. If anyone comes in with fresh views they are out numbered and drumed back by the super members. If this town is so messed up and you all know about it, then where is the rebellion? Do people show up at council meetings and echo the concerns into the record? What gives. I live in Newton County, but work in Neosho so I have no say in what happens here where city government is involved, but sometimes I believe I care more for your town than you do. I don't see the bad that most of you spill. I only wish that someone who might be considering relocating to this area does not find this forum on a web search.

[ozarkskid]

.
.
AMEN
.
.

[shinobi]

What a crock.
Admin, it's because of the time of year. People are preparing for winter and the holiday season. Doesn't this happen every year right before winter and again right before summer? It's always been cyclic.
The nubers will come back soon.

[Scutter]

RealityCheck, I am somewhat taken aback by your statement that the Membership has beaten back all those fresh ideas. In truth, I have not heard a fresh idea expressed since I have lived here, just the same ideas repackaged time and time again. Mostly what I hear is the same old "Neosho, love it or leave it" garbage which appears to be a resounding theme of both the City and the Chamber. To me a fresh idea would be the allocation of enough funding to solve the water problems, or enough funding to fill the potholes. I guess the expansion of the golf course could have been a fresh idea and we will only be paying for that for the next twenty five years. I suppose that a quarter of a million dollars in new golf carts was a fresh idea too. Maybe the fresh ideas came from the Consultants that cost the town thousands of dollars while the boilerplate reports lie at the bottom of someone's desk gathering dust. Maybe it was a fresh idea to absorb the maintenance cost for a stretch of four lane State Highway. Or then again, maybe the fresh idea was the new version of urban renewal which will bring our Square back to life. Or it could have been that the fresh idea was to spend thousands of dollars to advertise the town in a neighboring state. Or just maybe it was the five hundred dollars spent on chocolate airplanes at the dedication of a three quarters of a million dollar terminal building on an airport that nobody uses. Please enlighten us as to what all these fresh ideas were so we can get on board as Cheerleaders too.

[joetowngirl]

Originally posted by shinobi
What a crock.
Admin, it's because of the time of year. People are preparing for winter and the holiday season. Doesn't this happen every year right before winter and again right before summer? It's always been cyclic.
The numbers will come back soon.

Yeah, I agree with this. On most of the online forums and communities that I visit, it's been slow so it's not something happening only to Neosho Forums.

[kay9_medic]

Originally posted by RealityCheck
[...] If anyone comes in with fresh views they are out numbered and drumed back by the super members.


Just curious, not arguing the point, but to what fresh views are you referring?



If this town is so messed up and you all know about it, then where is the rebellion? Do people show up at council meetings and echo the concerns into the record?


Yes, people do. Last night for example, three people, one public and two city council members spoke to their concerns about the airport leasing and the ED contract respectively. At another recent meeting, a half dozen or so property owners attended in opposition to the cities plan to effect administrative search warrants on rental property. One of those property owners openly called the plan "communist". I know. I was there. It was plain to me that the deal was already done before these people even had a chance to open their mouths, and nothing was going change.



I don't see the bad that most of you spill.


Well, these wrongs aren't being skywrited or put on billboards. By design, they aren't obvious to a casual looking. It's like one of those color blindness tests, you know, where a number written in a certain color is invisible on the background until someone points it out to you? Then when you do see it, it seems so obvious standing out. These people writing here are just doing the pointing out.



I only wish that someone who might be considering relocating to this area does not find this forum on a web search.

Me, I wish that someone considering relocating here Does find this forum, in the interests of full disclosure. I wouldn't want someone to buy a pig in a poke.

This is not drumming you down, it's just a different opinion.

[wuli]

K9

Yours is a civil voice in an otherwise opaque uncivil city, but oh how hard the façade of political correctness is portrayed…here.

Out of civility for the two ladies who proposed this thread I will be civil…and no drumming.

I attended last nights meeting and with regard to a done deal: Some members had not even opened their packets prior to the meeting!
: That indicates to me a DONE deal
: With regard to the hanger thing, one councilman had a PREPARED, WRITTEN motion in the affirmative which HE read. That is not only a DONE deal, but WELL DONE, or OVERLY COOKED!
: Economic development and our Enron Double, aka, The Chamber received a red faced emotional monologue from the Mayor, where on the record he indicated how successful the two have been…While providing NO concrete supporting numbers or documentation…Like sales tax revenue increases since its inception, Building permit increases, Job numbers…nothing.

Also, in his rambling accolades to the hundreds of volunteers whom tirelessly support the council in its successful, undocumented, economic efforts he dragged in Crowder College and The R5. The boards of these two institutions need think long and hard about being poster children for this mayor and this council!

They will not find broad public support for any of their OWN endeavors when viewed if this light!

This council and this mayor are damaged goods! Leadership of any other public entity in this county had better be on the record as separate and apart and they better get on the record FAST!

[kay9_medic]

Indeed, in my own search for the truths, I make an effort to be as non partisan as I can be, and give people the benefit of the doubt until proven one way or the other. I try to be fair.

Maybe this isn't generally known but by my count, forum members and their spouses made up roughly 30% of the attendance at last night's council meeting. That says something.

What I saw was as wuli stated. The council agenda had obviously been backfilled with positions taken well before the gavel struck to open. It was as plain as the nose on anyone's face. At least one council member was obviously excluded from the prior backroom negotiations and made a fine effort to direct some sunshine in the questioning, for naught. I found the smirks and virtual eyerolling by the City Attorney, the Mayor and Councilman Langland, the body language, tone and attitude toward the questioning, particularly arrogant and obnoxious at certain points.

When asked where metrics could be found as to the value returned in exchange for those tax payer dollars given to the Economic Development Corp, the Mayor offered up the following gems, with parrots Persinger and Langland. Keep in mind that these are responses to comments saying that the city's contract with ED is vague, outlines no benchmarks, has no metrics nor methods of accountability of tax dollars:

The city can contract with whomever it pleases, by law.

Want to see the results? Just look around. Repeated twice.

If it isn't broke, don't fix it.

Then my favorite, the straw man argument. We have 100's of volunteers, business luminaries, Crowder, R-5, all working for the good of Neosho under the umbrella of Economic Development, and how dare we impugn them all by suggesting that an accounting of how tax dollars are spent is in order!

Give me a break. That was the biggest smokescreen I've ever seen.

Maybe Mssrs Birdsong, Persinger and Langland haven't been keeping up with current events, but this America, not some private fiefdom. We (the taxpayers that is) have a right to know exactly where and how our money is spent. As voters and stakeholders we have the right to discuss and decide if that money is well spent, if it is being frittered to the wind or to know if it's being used to line the pockets of anyone's golf buddies. The policy that tax payer monies gone to ED are out of public purview, and the unwillingness of the council to exert any oversight whatsoever, is outrageous. It is an overt avoidance of responsibility and exactly the kind of environment where corruption flourishes.

[Scutter]

Larry, Moe and Curly Joe much longer. I figure the people will know that Persinger only wants to be on the Council to trade his vote for City Contracts and will not return him to the Council this April. I predict that Mayor Birdsong will be reduced to the role of a Common Councilman in April and will probably have his hands full with potential lawsuits of former clients. As for Langland, I think he is about to walk into a buzzsaw for a situation he did not even forsee when he was elected. All in all, I predict that all three of these people will shortly pass into insignificance.

[admin]

Originally posted by RealityCheck
Don't fret that your numbers are down, because you are not the leading media source in town. You mostly don't get it. The Neosho Forums should have stayed Neosho Sucks because that is the theme of this forum. If anyone comes in with fresh views they are out numbered and drumed back by the super members. If this town is so messed up and you all know about it, then where is the rebellion? Do people show up at council meetings and echo the concerns into the record? What gives. I live in Newton County, but work in Neosho so I have no say in what happens here where city government is involved, but sometimes I believe I care more for your town than you do. I don't see the bad that most of you spill. I only wish that someone who might be considering relocating to this area does not find this forum on a web search.


Yea, I get it... And I intentionally do and say these things to get people going. And yes, we are the leading source of media in town when it comes to influence, and I wouldn't doubt if our numbers compare with the NDN or the Globe's. Face it, The Forums are much more powerful than any other media outlet out there right now, simply because any person can anonymously post anything they want and within minutes the entire town knows. This can be both good and bad, either way, I think it is great for Neosho (and a lot of fun for me)!

And you're right, I don't go to the council meetings... As I simply don't have the time.

[stunnerrr]

just wondering how many ACTUAL members do the forums have ? I mean there is no way the 6000 members showing on the home page is right. You can look page by page and tell that 50 %-75 % are spam accounts. Anyway to see a real number ?

[admin]

By the way, our hits have been way up, in fact we received more than 60,000 hits in one day last week.

And as for real members, we have just over 500. Most of the rest are SPAM BOTS... Which need deleted, but I've been to busy.

[hardrockers]

Why bother with the Globe or the NDN when we can read the truth of what is going on right here?

[Tincan]

Originally posted by admin
Yea, I get it... And I intentionally do and say these things to get people going. And yes, we are the leading source of media in town when it comes to influence, and I wouldn't doubt if our numbers compare with the NDN or the Globe's. Face it, The Forums are much more powerful than any other media outlet out there right now, simply because any person can anonymously post anything they want and within minutes the entire town knows. This can be both good and bad, either way, I think it is great for Neosho (and a lot of fun for me)!

And you're right, I don't go to the council meetings... As I simply don't have the time.


As true as this may be, there is information posted that is very far from the truth. A concern of mine lies in the fact that one day, misinformation that is posted will give rise to litigation.

[Scutter]

If we do face litigation Tincan, we can always retain Lawyer Hays, he seems to know how to skirt the law with impunity.

[John Kirby]

The stats maybe down, but being over 800 miles away, I can still keep up with whats going on in my home town.


this is an excellent website- and much needed for Neosho, and all the people who use to live there, and like to keep up with whats going on there..

Alot of time i tell my dad news from there, that he's not even aware of--- thanks to the forums

[Scutter]

Tincan, what world are you living in? The things posted on this board are the same things that are being said on the street and in the coffee shops in town. At least when they are posted, they are in the light of day and can be refuted if they are not valid. The only reason that the Forums is in such disfavor with the powers that be is because things are stated here that the Back Room Boys would prefer that the Citizens of our fair City do not become aware of.

[Scutter]

I guess we may finally be doing something right. Maybe when the Daily sells, we might have some competition.

[red]

and a "few" smart A##@%:think::eek:!!!!!

[shinobi]

This question of two years past can now be answered; if you read the threads you’ll find eleven active loyal liberal members, and the Zzigster.

Just as with any forum type site, we have those that participate and we have many more that just read.

Then we have those that think they are participating when they are actually just trolls. They offer no substantial content or personal insight.

[jimmie]

and, of course, the way to attract more regular contributors is to call them trolls who offer "no substantial content or personal insight." Do we need to guess who judges what is "substantial content and personal insight?"

[shinobi]

Oh, well pardon me for pointing out the obvious.
Let's all join hands a sing Koom Bah Yah.
Let the trolls (oops, I'm sorry. I meant something entirely different and nice), and the Martin Lindsteadt wannabees post away!

I will promise you this jimmie, find one obviously substantial contribution Revolution has made in his 191 posts up to this point , 8:50pm 15 Novenmber, 2009, that is relevant and is supported by facts and I'll apologize to him.

[kay9_medic]

Every kid on the soccer team should get a trophy just for showing up, and every belief should be given equal weight regardless of merit.

Even if that belief is cut & paste by a person who can't explain a single thought they have, let alone begin to have a position.

Even if that belief is as absurd a claim that lizard people from Antares VI secretly control the shadow cabal that runs our one-world government. It's a belief, with a virtue all it's own, not having to stand to scrutiny.

Am I right?

Can anyone explain why it's unreasonable or irrational to judge people for their beliefs?

Is it reasonable to judge a person because they believe women are inferior to men? Blacks inferior to whites? What about if they believe in cannibalism? How about slavery? Infanticide? Blood-sacrifice?

Are some of you people honestly suggesting it's never rational and reasonable and - let's face it - right, to judge someone for their beliefs?

If we are not subject to judgment for our beliefs, then why not adopt ridiculous beliefs since we'll just be able to enjoy the benefits without the cost?

[emissaryscribe]

Judging beliefs and censoring are two different things. Of course, each of us determine some sort of personal belief system or unbelief system and discount to a point, others with a different one, but in America, I would hope censoring is still a bad idea, even on forums. I certainly don't give every post I read the same size "trophy." I have found many of these cut and paste folks will not even respond to a logical question at all. We all have a choice to the threads in which we participate and how many times we go back to make a point or simply stir the pot.

[kay9_medic]

Other than Lindstedt, who has been forbidden to speak (aka censored)?

That's what I thought.

Freedom of speech, it's for everyone. Exercise yours today, but don't get your knickers in a twist when someone else uses their freedom of speech to tear down your strawman.

[Scutter]

In the ten plus years that the Forums have been up in one form or another, only two members have been banned. One was Adolph and the other was Martin. Neither was banned for the content of their comments but, rather, for the personal threats they made against other members. We will always edit out profanity and obscenity that escapes the blocks and that is just the way it will be.

[emissaryscribe]

That sounds reasonable, Scutter.
Profanity and personal threats do push the threshold of free speech. Besides, aren't some words worth fines of hundreds of thousands?

[Scutter]

We really do try to be "fair and balanced" ES, even to the cut and paste groupies.

[emissaryscribe]

I know you do, Scutter. The Neosho Forums "fair and balanced" doesn't have to be constantly reiterated, it truly shows in the various posts.

[shinobi]

I disagree. You are making a blanket statement about the members here. We are a very diverse group. Even the regulars don't agree on everything.

And I have to ask again, why do you keep coming back if we're so bad?

[Scutter]

I am constantly amazed at these folks who talk about their "freedoms" being restricted and I have to wonder exactly what "freedoms" have been taken from them. As I recall, nobody who voted Republican has been placed in detention. None of them have had their property conficated. None of them have been banned from Government or Private Sector employment. None of them have subjected to "investigation". I really am curious as to just what "freedoms" exactly they have lost over the course of the last year.

[kay9_medic]

I am constantly amazed at these folks who talk about their "freedoms" being restricted and I have to wonder exactly what "freedoms" have been taken from them. As I recall, nobody who voted Republican has been placed in detention. None of them have had their property conficated. None of them have been banned from Government or Private Sector employment. None of them have subjected to "investigation". I really am curious as to just what "freedoms" exactly they have lost over the course of the last year.

There you go again Scutter, being grounded in reality. As Revolution would say, blind, so very blind. So very very blind.

See, people have a constitutional right to be ignorant mislead gits, and anyone pointing at them and laughing is OPPRESSION, CENSORSHIP and taking MAH FREEDOMS.

Honestly? These weak-minded people are so immersed in victim mentality and fearful specters of phantom boogymen that reality has long receded into the rearview mirror. They see persecution where none exists and a shadowy threat behind every tree and under every bed.

Common denominators? To a person, they identify as either a right-winger, a religious fanatic, just plain off-the-rocker or a combination thereof. Another common denominator. Each of them has 'someone' telling them who to fear and who to hate, they believe every word 'someone' says without a moment's question or hesitation, they'll defend 'someone' with religious fervor, and anyone who disagrees is demonized.

Did I describe anyone(s) we know?

[kay9_medic]

The word of the day is:

de·mon·ize (dm-nz)
tr.v. de·mon·ized, de·mon·iz·ing, de·mon·iz·es
1. To turn into or as if into a demon.
2. To possess by or as if by a demon.
3. To represent as evil or diabolic.

I represent someone as evil, diabolical or possessed by a demon? Really? Or are you just saying that?

I don't think you're the Prince of Darkness at all "Revolution". A mildly annoying Pete and Repeat, yes. A git, for sure. Beelzebub? Not hardly.

[emissaryscribe]

Revolution,
Shinobi is right, no need for a blanket statement. There are several "regulars" that disagree on a number of issues and there are those, and I would say they are a small percentage of the forums members, from both political leanings that monopolize a thread to contend, using euphemisms such as inform and discuss. Truth of the matter is, there are very few people in any given group that consider their core values to be open to serious debate. Diversity not withstanding, I don't know of too many people that relish a discussion with someone who openly and repeatedly looks for opportunity to discount their beliefs, or cuts and pastes the beliefs of someone else.

[Chris Wright]

I think the stats just went up with the news about our city manager.

[Scutter]

Our stats are very high Chris. Revolution just went back and brought up a very old thread to post on. We are well over thirty thousand per day right now and rising. The board in general quit counting at twelve million hits or so.

[Huck Finn]

Some of us try to listen and learn, and keep our mouths shut unless we have something of substance to add. Or feel passionately about. And K9 has responded to my post without demonizing me. TY k9

[kay9_medic]

Some of us try to listen and learn, and keep our mouths shut unless we have something of substance to add. Or feel passionately about. And K9 has responded to my post without demonizing me. TY k9

I once ran over some dude with my Ferrari because he was talking trash about 'Miami Vice' though.

[kay9_medic]

Now that got me thinking.

It always strikes me odd that folks who tout their First Amendment rights to the freedom of expression are amazed when others do the same.

The freedom of speech is the freedom to piss other people off. It isn't about comforting speech, it isn't about speech that others agree with, but rather the speech that makes others feel uncomfortable. That's why it is protected. Because it pisses people off. The freedom of speech is not about the freedom FROM being insulted, but rather the freedom TO be insulted, and ridiculed, and made to feel uncomfortable.

Only when the State steps in and tries to shut you down can you claim a violation of your First Amendment rights, otherwise, that's just the natural consequence of unpopular speech. Unpopular speech is protected from the State moving on you, but not from your neighbors telling you that they disagree with your views.

[kay9_medic]

So kay9, this is all you get out of “freedom of speech”? Just another tool for you to “make others feel uncomfortable”. Open your eyes, freedom of speech is much more…oops, you can’t open what you don’t have….

My analysis of your analysis(?) of my words leads me to a belief that you seem to be missing a few important wrinkles in your brain, "Revolution". Have you considered sleeping upside down?

Go Free Speech!

[emissaryscribe]

Revolution,
I think K-9 speaks for the majority of Americans regarding free speech. Free speech in America is upheld to be the right to incite. It's not perceived just to be the right to be insulted, ridiculed, and made to feel uncomfortable, it seems in many venues to also be the right to be insulting, to ridicule and cause discomfort. Could be, our right of free speech, is why so much of the rest of the world sees Americans as rude and arrogant. It doesn't always do a lot to keep the pathway of discussion open, win friends and influence people, but I do hope we maintain our First Amendment Right. Whether it's talk radio, news commentary, or internet forums, there will always be those that exercise more of their free speech than others.

[Revolution]

Revolution,
I think K-9 speaks for the majority of Americans regarding free speech. Free speech in America is upheld to be the right to incite. It's not perceived just to be the right to be insulted, ridiculed, and made to feel uncomfortable, it seems in many venues to also be the right to be insulting, to ridicule and cause discomfort. Could be, our right of free speech, is why so much of the rest of the world sees Americans as rude and arrogant. It doesn't always do a lot to keep the pathway of discussion open, win friends and influence people, but I do hope we maintain our First Amendment Right. Whether it's talk radio, news commentary, or internet forums, there will always be those that exercise more of their free speech than others.

#1 10-12-2007, 06:34 AM
shinobi
Event Manager & Moderator Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: It ain't Shangri-la!
Posts: 5,568

People that shouldn't be allowed near a Radio or TV Studio...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ann Coulter

Glen Beck

Bill ORiley

Rush Limbaugh

to be continued...
__________________
“People that shouldn't be allowed near a Radio or TV Studio...” Just another blind liberal attempt to insult and restrict.

Kay9’s focus on “freedom of speech” is to disrupt, we have that right, however, as I stated…there is much more to freedom of speech. Kay9 is unable to look to the light or the Right.

[shinobi]

Had you read further, you'd have seen that I explained why I posted that, numbskull.
I have to ask, did you suffer a brain injury or something?

[kay9_medic]

Kay9’s focus on “freedom of speech” is to disrupt, we have that right, however, as I stated…there is much more to freedom of speech. Kay9 is unable to look to the light or the Right.


Two thoughts.

I pick on you (wahhhh, sniff sniff) specifically, "Revolution", because you are a talking bumper sticker injecting yourself into issues that are far above your own intellect. You can't even manage to express a coherent thought without copy pasting it from somewhere else, but still that doesn't stop you from making an *** of yourself.

Care to prove my point (like it hasn't already been)?

"There is much more to freedom of speech" you say. Twice, in case anyone missed it the first time? OK, lets hear it - give an essay, in your own words, on the First Amendment. Include citations and footnotes. You want some credibility? There ya go - earn it. Either put up, STFU or keep coming back for more mockery. So far, the latter is about all you're good for.

I already know you won't put up, because you would expose yourself for what you are. Low hanging fruit.

The second thought now.

This is something I've been dwelling on lately, this attitude of "take our country back!" that has been coming from the right lately. And after seeing such a blatant example, I just want to put it out there to every "conservative" or Republican reading this:

AMERICA DOES NOT BELONG TO YOU.

You are not the custodians of our ideals or the rightful heirs of the Founding Fathers. America is one of the most dynamic and diverse countries in the history of this planet, and America doesn't belong to any one ideology. The only thing America belongs to is her people and the majority who govern her through our democratic process.

[JohnReltney]

We are only getting 9,000 - 10,000 page views per day... What gives? I know we are still the leading media source in town, but we are losing numbers... And I want to know why!

Right under your very nose, Admin. You have made the liberal idiots get to run their own asylum. They proceed to censor or ban everyone who made the forum 'interesting' under various guises, some perhaps true but usually not.

As a result, there really isn't anything to argue anymore because you banned or censored or 'warned' off everyone willing to make an argument against the 'right-meaning' f-tards running your forum -- right into the ground.

If you have any interest in this forum, it is because as a 'bitch-board' everyone likes to see those in power revealed to be idiots. But boredom sets in when you figure out that this board is likewise populated with idiots of the left, who would in turn make things even worse.

So if your clowns are no better than the government official clowns, then of course boredom sets in. You have no conflict on this board and thus it is a snoozer.

Also, half the time I try to go to this web page, every odd week or so, this page is down or under construction or something. That might have something to do with it. But mainly, I think it is because of the low quality of people you have posting on it. The only reason I come over here is to get the dirt from these liberal swine -- who occasionally unearth a truffle. Most of the time they are simply nothing but liberal swine bitching on a bitch forum.

Also, the v-bulletin options on this forum are limited. No linking or embedding to youtube like most blogs and forums. No interesting smilies posting pictures. This place really is sorta low-rent compared to most forums.

But mainly I'd say that it is because of your sanctimonious liberal idiot posters with nothing much interesting to say who don't like people making fun of them and their doctrinaire liberal silliness.


Hello DICK!
Keep on scripting on this thread like this and these liberals will edit you off the forum….LOL

Well, Revolution, it seems like dissent and humor is none too much appreciated where these evil liberals [d]rule.

And, when it comes down to it, we both probably know how to use sockpuppets. But to what end? There are thousands of idiot forums just like this one all over the place. The difference is that we live here in Southwest Missouri and thus know the government idiots that these liberal idiots are bitching about, and like liberal idiots even less than the idiots running things who at least are smart enough to get elected because they mouth the idiocies that the majority of idiots living here subscribe to.

So, in effect, we are outsiders looking in on outsiders.


Anyone catch on to what a reltney actually is?

Tee hee hee...

Years ago, while in the army and having nothing else to do, I was reading some fine technical literature, i.e. Penthouse. I came across a letter from England wherein the protagonist wrote about his 'reltney' getting something strange. So, I thought, what a fine English name to use as a joke alias.

So, I used this name in signing up as a joke name. I knew you idiots were dim -- after all you liberals are evil, not intelligent -- but probably not dim enough to use 'Dick Reltney' as a username. So, Heather, glad to see that we share similar tastes in reading material. :think: :)

In any case, I think it is better than the idiot names that the [d]ruling idiots choose for their idiot postings, and it has the advantage of showing that even a 'DickReltney' can see better with his one eye that idiot liberals can see with two. Frankly, the name was chosen to show my contempt for you fools.


About to be history on this site is what I'm thinking.

Liberals have no sense of humor. For that matter, they have no sense at all.

[edited for obscenity - mod]

Liberals really have nothing to do with their dreary lives other than bitch about how other people are running things. Which is why all of your plotting and scheming to change things has amounted to nothing over the years. Everyone looking in knows that things can't get any worse unless they are stupid enough to let liberals like these run things. Then its SNAFU and FUBAR all the way.

I wondered where to put this thread. I went up to the 'General Information' thread and was about to start a new thread when I seen this thread. It seems that admin and the rest know what is ailing this forum: It is because the idiots running it can't stand to be made fun of, so they threaten to ban or censor anyone who comes on here and makes fun of them.

Which is fine. But it leads to you fools simply circle-jerking yourselves. The only benefit is that if we need to watch it is free. The newspapers had to charge for their little conformity dictatorships, and so they lost readers and an audience. Here, all that will happen is that when you censor or ban the interesting people, nobody much has a reason to go to your little private outhouse on the Internet.


Indeed he is Shinobi. Your input is requested at the "other place".

A 22,000+ post idiot with nothing else to do with his miserable, otherwise pointless, life. He's going to bitch to his other idiot about someone crashing the private outhouse.


Just visited. Left a comment.

I wonder what that comment is gonna be? :cry:




Warning

We are getting complaints of your use of the word **** and your request, however intended, for pictures of **** and the use of the word "*******".

You must beleive me when I say this, I support your right to say anything you feel you must. You'll just have to say it elsewhere.

Failure to comply will result in suspention of your account or deletion of your account.



If it was up to me, I'd put all these 'liberals' on an island -- say Madagascar -- and let them sodomize each other to their heart's content.

You see, it is really impossible to live in peace with those liberals so far gone that they think that public discourse belongs to them alone as a matter of right, whining and puling about how conservative public officials and the conservative public that elected them run things, and then on their own little outhouse clubhouse run things like Joseph Stalin did from the Kremlin.

Such people should be treated as the potential and likely criminals and parasites eroding civilization when possible and with all due contempt for their hypocrisy when they think they are in power, like now.

[JohnReltney]

Another thing is that the tools -- the forum ones, er, the featured ones on this forum -- don't allow the user to go back and delete extra posts. In short, it is set up for liberal idiots to post their idiot one-line 'Muhdikkk!' posts so that they can rack up 22,000 of them without much thought needed to strain their little liberal brains.

[kay9_medic]

Calm down, have some dip and break up that bona-fide Larry the Cable Guy Manifesto into smaller pieces.

You need poorly written signs and misspelled slogans on t-shirts to properly get your message out. Get to it, man.

[kay9_medic]

I edited your post there JohnReltney, removing the vulgar language. Not permitted here.

[kay9_medic]

They proceed to censor or ban everyone who made the forum 'interesting' under various guises, some perhaps true but usually not.

so they threaten to ban or censor anyone who comes on here and makes fun of them.


Here, all that will happen is that when you censor or ban the interesting people,

In the real world (the one we live in), I'm told that only two posters have been banned in the entire time this site has been active. Having never had the pleasure of exposure to them (both were before my time) I don't know what exactly precipitated that action but I've seen samples of Martin Lindstedt's work, so I can imagine. So, to borrow the words of the immortal Twit Of The Tundra, how 'bout in honor of the American soldier, ya quit makin' things up. We call that lyin' where I come from.

With that said, there isn't any vulgarity you come up Johnny that I haven't heard before a hundred times in ten different languages so you aren't going to shock me. There is absolutely nothing that you can ham-fist mash your keyboard in our general direction that will bother anyone here. You might be a touch grateful to the commies and libs for providing this virtual private property (free of charge!) forum on which you can shake your tiny impotent fists at the world, but thanks aren't expected or required.

You won't get censored or banned for your views, satirized maybe, ridiculed possibly, but not censored. You see, if it weren't for folks like you, people would have to actually think up new jokes, which is hard.

However, you can (may yet) get bounced for vulgarity. That's a no-no. You might be the pride of your row at the middle school, but playground vulgarity for the sake of being vulgar won't fly here. Before you go get all huffy about your first amendment rights to be a pest on someone else's virtual property, I suggest you actually, you know, read it.

If all that bothers you in any way, all i can say is...
.

[admin]

Well we must be doing something right... We had more than 35,000 page views yesterday (Nov 24) and have had over 30,000 so far since midnight last night.

Not bad!

[Chris Wright]

Actually that also is not completely true either. I'm not a liberal and I have the privlage to be a moderator. I saw part that was deleted by kay-9. There was no room for what was said. Completely sexest and just plain vulgar. I'm not doggin on you Revolution I'm just tryin to tell it like I see it. Just continue with what you want to say on the forums, just dont be vulgar like Mr. Realty

[kay9_medic]

You are the exception, a “non-lib” Moderator….you must be the only one!


I'll take "Dogs that won't hunt" for $1000, Alex. The moderators are all across the spectrum.

You realize, don't you, that needling republitards doesn't make you a "lib"? A lot of people just oppose the republican plan to destroy America.



I would not be surprised if kay9 didn’t double register as JohnReltney


Possibly.

I might have double-registered as Revolution also. I might be you, and the two of us in the same room at the same time could very well rend the time-space continuum, destroying the universe.

[kay9_medic]

In fact I may be double-registered as ALL Neosho Forums user accounts, and absolutely no one is reading or making posts but me because I just hate ignoring myself.

If a message board post falls in the forest and there is no one there to read it, does it make a sound?

[JohnReltney]

They proceed to censor or ban everyone who made the forum 'interesting' under various guises, some perhaps true but usually not.

so they threaten to ban or censor anyone who comes on here and makes fun of them.


Here, all that will happen is that when you censor or ban the interesting people,

In the real world (the one we live in), I'm told that only two posters have been banned in the entire time this site has been active. Having never had the pleasure of exposure to them (both were before my time) I don't know what exactly precipitated that action but I've seen samples of Martin Lindstedt's work, so I can imagine. So, to borrow the words of the immortal Twit Of The Tundra, how 'bout in honor of the American soldier, ya quit makin' things up. We call that lyin' where I come from.

You don't know what the truth in the matter but rather must imagine what you think it was based upon what side you were on. Since the above-mentioned bannee's work was deleted, you are left to imagining what was said that was so bad. And then, since it didn't fit with your reality, whatever is said then which goes contrary to your little notions is defined as 'lying.'

I suggest that if you wish to call someone a liar that you need to have some proof that they lied. But since you don't, like most people who think that they are in power, you simply make sweeping statements that their adversaries are 'lying' and then make threats about how you are going to banish their enemies from bringing in new thoughts incongruent with their delusions of adequacy.

Case in point: The MSNBC/Obongo Channel vs. the Faux News/Dumbya Channel. Neither of them are real news channels, but rather the partisan channels of the mainstream pretending to stand for something, like the fake Democrat/Republican two-party scam. No matter who 'wins' the People get screwed.

Not that like every other 'tard of longstanding whom the admin of this third-rate forum made a moderator you are any different than all of the rest. In fact, I'd say that you are typical of those infesting this forum -- some loser in loserville demanding that anyone visiting be subject to being exactly like yourself. When in Rome, do as the Romans do, and when in Loserville, do as the Losers do.

http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2009/3/10/633722410581511610-population.jpg



With that said, there isn't any vulgarity you come up Johnny that I haven't heard before a hundred times in ten different languages so you aren't going to shock me. There is absolutely nothing that you can ham-fist mash your keyboard in our general direction that will bother anyone here. Not that any of us were going to take any chances, which is why I sanctimoniously deleted your little off-color joke. Like most liberal idiots I just gotta show how tough I am while at the same time menstruating about the horror of what you said. George Carlin (http://voices.idahostatesman.com/2007/11/14/mdeeds/george_carlin_not_a_liberal_just_anti_united_state s) would have a field day with such as myself and the rest of the Neosho F-tards (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8_YL3q1--U)


George Carlin used to ridicule your sort of idiot relentlessly. He hated to be known as a liberal.

I fail to see why you think that for all your protestations you shouldn't be regarded as a hypocrite. Since a hypocrite is a caught liar, thus as a liar as well.



You might be a touch grateful to the commies and libs for providing this virtual private property -- which is the first time that us Neosho commies and libs ever had any great love for private property, what is yours is ours and what is ours is ours -- (free of charge!-- and worth every penny you paid for it)) forum on which you can shake your tiny impotent fists at the world, but thanks aren't expected or required. What we commies and libs do demand is that you don't ridicule us and rupture our little delusions and make us bleed at both ends. Us commies and libs don't like getting our butts stomped in our own little private clubhouse!


What I like about you liberals is your everlasting sense of earnest hypocrisy. Why, none of us have any right to freedom of association or private property whatsoever. Yet, when you provide a liberal club/outhouse, a unibrow tweezing salon and circle-jerkiery on the Misinformation Stuporhighway, why that is when you liberals discover the joys of private property.

Well, this idiotic hypocrisy is why being a right-winger is coming back in style. Because you liberals make it moral for a lunch-counter to refuse to serve blacks. And, that private property behavior thus goes up to the tribal level. If you liberals get to censor, ban, or regulate to your own parochial interests what happens in your scruffy clubhouse/outhouse against conservatives, then shouldn't the Afghans decide that they wish for a Taliban form of government and have Osama bin Laden as a houseguest indefinitely? Is it not their own country for them to decide who lives and who dies there? And, if the Germany of 1933 wanted to elect a chancellor who will refuse to serve jews, then did they not have that moral right to decide what to do with their social property via democracy?

Of course they do and did. The Taliban and the Nazis and the Confederate South didn't have any moral weaknesses. Rather they had military weaknesses in being forced to fight for their lives against a stronger bully and thus got beat down. Liberals, in addition to being liars and hypocrites, are also bullies who have nothing except force to compel obedience to their whims. They know this, which is why you liberals are evil, because nobody who knows what liberals are like will ever let them near power, which is why you must lie and sneak around to get your way.

Liberals like yourself really have nothing except power to do whatever you want in your own little pariah circles. Take away power from a liberal, then the end result is a powerless whiner claiming that he has a moral right to tell others what to do.

So, I'll grant that you and the other Neosho F-tards have the power to censorship and ban me and any others of your enemies who come onto this forum, your private clubhouse, to make fun of you. However, like the retarded five-year-old faced with the Hobson's choice of having your cake and eating it too, censoring and deleting the comments of your enemies will result in those looking on figuring out, correctly, that you are nothing other than typical liberal whiners unable to hold your own in debate.

So, now that you liberals have resurrected the moral superiority of the Ku Klux Klan and National Socialist German Workers Party -- they were merely embarking upon the popular political methods demanded by their fellow citizens and having the right to associate with whom they pleased and do with their property as they wished to the exclusion of their enemies -- please feel free to ban me and Revolution given that we are running rings around you in your own little club/outhouse.



You won't get censored or banned for your views, satirized maybe, ridiculed possibly, but not censored. It's not censorship when a liberal does it. And in case you haven't noticed yet, us liberals can't satirize conservatives, just threaten to ban them if their humor gets cutting. You see, if it weren't for folks like you, people would have to actually think up new jokes, which is hard for liberals with no sense of humor. Also, if it wasn't for people like you, people like me wouldn't have government jobs and thus might starve.

However, you can (may yet) get bounced for vulgarity. That's a no-no. Us liberal faggots don't dare say 'crap' even if we have a mouth full of it because once we start eating that nazti brown stuff, we simply cannot stop eating. Please, don't make my castration fantasies cum true!!! You might be the pride of your row at the middle school, but playground vulgarity for the sake of being vulgar won't fly here. Us liberals are, well, edumacated with the finest of pub[l]ic skrule edumacation, to where we are really really smart, if we, and even if nobody else, says so oursselfs. Before you go get all huffy about your first amendment rights to be a pest on someone else's virtual property, I suggest you actually, you know, read it. Wez not gonna open up our little liberal club/out-house up to you conservatives even though we insist that you open up your private property, like lunch counters to whoever we liberals say you have to open it up so that we will think we are so morally superior.

That's what I like about you liberals and government workers. You have absolutely no morals but even better, you have absolutely no sense either.

Civilization depends upon recognizing that even your enemies have a right to exist, to think as they please, to have 'free speech' even when they come onto your crappy self-congradulatory forum. When you say that anyone who comes onto your forum must do whatever you say, must conform to whatever little laws and rules you make up on the spot, then you open the gates to where your enemies can do the same thing where you and they live. Once you make it a matter of power who gets to make the rules and enforce it accordingly with your police, thus you fragment the social order to where such matters are determined by violence and terrorism. I don't think us conservatives will forever let you do whatever you please at our expense.

So given that I think that the Right is organically stronger, when you liberals tear up the unwritten social civil rulebook in order to get your transient way, I rejoice.



If all that bothers you in any way, all i can say is...
.

I've been looking at this forum the past couple of years. It is a prime example of liberal silliness in what is probably the most conservative area of the US.

A number of people asked me to come on here and rip you idiots a new one. I myself despise politicians, and see no reason to keep liberal idiots perpetually on the outs from dishonestly ripping into them. They have power and you idiots, for all your whining over the years, have certainly proven that if given power that you would certainly screw things up a lot worse.

So why am I ripping you idiots a new one? Well, I had nothing better to do. That and someone I wanted to post on one of my blogs promised to come onto my blog if I'd tear into you liberal idiots.

And, this gives me material for my own blogs and forums, so censor away. A number of others elsewhere are reading and giggling and so I ask them to not let the cat out of the bag until I've had plenty of fun at Neosho F-Tards' expense and you idiots do choose to ban me under whatever excuse you make up to do so.

You Neosho F-tards really do need to thank me for stirring up the crap in your unibrow tweezing salon & circle-jerkiery, your little club/out-house. You were as complacent as turkeys a month before Thanksgiving and if you are able to think in order to respond, with a thinking response as opposed to censorship and bannings, then you have me to thank.

Also, you might get some people to actually look at your dead forum now that you got some opposition other than 'Revolution.'

[kay9_medic]

Ahhhh... it's like a mountain spring of pure, sparkling, distilled, wingnut wharrgarrbl.

You need to be more subtle Johnny John. Seriously. Trolling is an art. You can't just vomit objectionable nonsense into a thread and hope your little act catches fire. You need to plant little sparks here and there, and let that fire start on it's own.

Also, be funny. Trolling is great if the person doing it is funny.

Please keep those tears of impotent rage coming. They are tasty!

.

[JohnReltney]

Actually that also is not completely true either. I'm not a liberal and I have the privlage to be a moderator. I saw part that was deleted by kay-9. There was no room for what was said. Completely sexest and just plain vulgar. I'm not doggin on you Revolution I'm just tryin to tell it like I see it. Just continue with what you want to say on the forums, just dont be vulgar like Mr. Realty

I see that you are the Neosho F-tard choice for city kouncil-kritter.

I certainly hope that your behavior here on this forum will warn everyone not to vote for you.

Why?

Well, the current kouncil-kritters, for all their faults, will allow insofar as I know, for any ordinary citizens to make an appointment to criticize them without using the police forces to arrest them for this dissent.

Whereas you, on a crappy little 'liberal' forum which has no power other than to whine and bitch about how the current idiots on the city council run things, would make up rules in order to justify censoring myself.

Since those little petty men who show that they cannot be trusted in little things will show a tendency to uncivil and uncivilized action in the big things, I suggest that if the voters were stupid enough to [s]elect you as a city council-kritter that if you had the power you probably would have the police arrest or harass anyone who publicly criticized you. If given a choice between a crook and a sanctimonious moral imbecile always go with the crook. The crooks will steal trifles from the common purse, but the do-gooder moral imbeciles will destroy your lives, your liberties as well as the basis for the holding of private property, and thus the entire social order itself.

Why you are another little two-bit Joseph Stalin, another Pol Pot. So for the benefit of whoever you are running against, hopefully an incumbent, I have a nickname for you: Pol 'Piss' Pot.

Pol 'Piss' Pot for c[sh?]itty kouncil-kritter. Endorked by Neosho F-tards!!! It has a wring to it, like "A Crow in Every Pot" and "Forty Acres & A Jackass!"

Well, you lost my vote, Pol 'Piss' Pot. Thank God I don't live in Neoshole.

[Scutter]

John I want to thank you for putting us all in our places. You have felt free to come on the Forums and badmouth the very instrument that gave you a place to speak your piece. Now, having said that, I am about an inch from making you disappear. Unlike Kay 9 and the other Moderators, I do not have to play by the rules and sometimes I do not play by the rules. You do one more of these tirades and you will have the honor of being the third person to be banned from this Forum.

[JohnReltney]

Ahhhh... it's like a mountain spring of pure, sparkling, distilled, wingnut wharrgarrbl.

You need to be more subtle Johnny John. Seriously. Trolling is an art. You can't just vomit objectionable nonsense into a thread and hope your little act catches fire. You need to plant little sparks here and there, and let that fire start on it's own.

Also, be funny. Trolling is great if the person doing it is funny.

Please keep those tears of impotent rage coming. They are tasty!

.

What to say to such an invincible act of arrogant stupidity? Well, at least I've never had to put my thumb on the scale and censor anyone, but rather always have given back with interest whatever thrown my way.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=it9kpZHXhxI&feature=related

Your silliness reminds me of a joke.

Two liberals are in Yellowstone Park and they annoy a grizzly bear. The bear goes after them. So one of the liberals digs deep into his backpack and pulls out a set of running shoes. The other stupid liberal stops and says something about how the shoes ain't gonna help him outrun a grizzly bear. So the other liberal tells him that it is not necessary to outrun the bear -- all that is needed is to outrun his soon to be ex-best friend.

The fact of the matter is that this forum is essentially filled with a bunch of liberal idiots running a mutual admiration society and circle jerk. Which is fine, as long as you at least retain the necessary hold on reality to realize that nobody but yourselfs are enthralled by your self-congradulatory nonsense.

The minute you get opposition then you will have to make the admission that only censorship can save you or you must decide that you are going to put up a fight. But when the tariff walls of censorship are removed, then you are essentially doomed.

Of course, as liberals, you have no means of winning the 'trade war in ideas' because you are essentially bankrupt in that regard.

I have no doubt that those you have been lying about will probably be watching and giggling. And I'll be sure to tell my conservative friends to log on and ridicule you idiots. Why, the entire Reltney clan might show up at your door!

I don't like being called Johnny John. Call me Dick-Dick, instead.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dik-dik

Do you know that some Dick-Dicks can beat the crap out of lyin' hyenas?

[Scutter]

I seem to have hit the wrong button. Anyway John, see you in a couple of months.

[Cyril Reltney]

Sceutter_The_Neutered[/B];90323]In the ten plus years that the Forums have been up in one form or another, only two members have been banned. One was Adolph and the other was Martin. Neither was banned for the content of their comments but, rather, for the personal threats they made against other members. We will always edit out profanity and obscenity that escapes the blocks and that is just the way it will be.Cousin Dick Dick didn't make any threats at all, and he was banned by Sceutter The Neutered. So maybe it was the content, rather than any threats that he allegedly made.

[Scutter]

You take your Neo Nazi Bullstuff back to Granby Martin, or i am going to have another oops. But come to think of it, I did mis-speak myself. Both Adolph and Marting, as well as John. were banned because fo the contents of their threads. Hey, what the hell, it is our board and if you want to spew hate do it on your own board.

Let me say this in terms you can understand. We will control the content of our board and we willl make the decisions about whether your posts stay or not. You had your warning over your pornagraphic avitar and you are not getting another warning.

[kay9_medic]

Hey, before you get the ban you're angling for here Martin, what's your blog URL?

It might amuse me to come visit you there.

[Cyril Reltney]

You take your Neo Nazi Bullstuff back to Granby Martin, or i am going to have another oops.
Calm down Sceutter_The_Neutered not everybody that is outsmarting you is Martin Lindstedt, or lives in Granby, nor are they neo-nutzis, or do they make threats that only you can hear.

Cousin Dick Dick and I had a fine time tag teaming you idiots, and now we must leave to inform the rest of Al Gore's internet what idiots and criminals infest neosho forums. I'll now leave you and the rest of neosho F-tards to look underneath of your bed to be sure that this Martin fellow isn't underneath it. QUICK call 911, OB1Shinobi are you listening?

[Scutter]

Go in Peace Cyril. Oops, damnit I did it again, that makes four. Well not really, since he was already banned.

[kay9_medic]

dang, I was three minutes too late

[kay9_medic]

How can troll posts be recognised?

* No Imagination - Most are frighteningly obvious; sexist comments on nurses' groups, blasphemy on religious groups .. I kid you not.

* Pedantic in the Extreme - Many trolls' preparation is so thorough, that while they waste time, they appear so ludicrous from the start that they elicit sympathetic mail - the danger is that once the group takes sides, the damage is done.

* Identity - Often revealing their trolliness (and lack of imagination) in the chosen ID.

* Crossposting - Any post that is crossposted to several groups should be viewed as suspicious, particularly if unrelated or of opposing perspective. Why would someone do that?

* Off-topic posting - Often genuine errors, but, if from an 'outsider' they deserve matter-of-fact response; if genuine, a brief apposite response is simply netiquette; if it's a troll post, you have denied it its reward.

* Repetition of a question or statement is either a troll - or a pedant; either way, treatment as a troll is effective.

* Missing The Point - Trolls rarely answer a direct question - they cannot, if asked to justify their twaddle - so they develop a fine line in missing the point.

* Thick or Sad - Trolls are usually sad, lonely folk, with few social skills; they rarely make what most people would consider intelligent conversation. However, they frequently have an obsession with their IQ and feel the need to tell everyone. This is so frequent, that it is diagnostic! Somewhere on the web there must be an Intelligence Test for Trolls - rigged to always say "above 150"

Who is at risk?

Any newsgroup, bulletin board, forum or chatroom can attract trolls, but they don't have the brains to attack nuclear physicists, and they are drawn to the quick response where sex, religion and race are found; so politics is easy prey.

One troll famously tried to infiltrate a mensa group; the results read like 100 trolls and one regular, it didn't have a chance - but it was stupid enough to persist until removed.

When Should You Be Concerned?

Usually, no, though fractured funny bones and occasional waves of nausea have been reported.

When a troll become persistent and personal, you may need to consider the possibility that it has fermented into an Internet Stalker - equally pathetic, if not more so - but sometimes requiring weedkiller.

Find Out More (http://www.flayme.com/troll/)

.

[Scutter]

I banned one IP and got three Members. How is that for a triple hit?

[kay9_medic]

Hey "Revolution"

When you check in on Lindstedt's blog, tell him this for me.

You want to know what the leftiest lib in San Fran and the rightest red-stater in Kansas can stand together with, putting their differences aside and close ranks shoulder to shoulder?

They'll stand together to destroy evil, just like Hitler was destroyed. If you recall, Hitler spent his last days living in a bunker and ended up being nothing but a few charred bones in an unmarked grave, reviled by all and his name cursed for as long as men have memory.

Mad dogs don't get the same consideration that men do.

You're still a young man. Step away from the likes of Lindstedt, before that evil consumes you also.

[Scutter]

Revolution, you just picked a very bad day to go after Kay 9 again. Hear me well youngster, back off him and back off now.

[kay9_medic]

I got you figured out "Revolution". The dots are all pretty much connected now.

You know what's really great about holding a high level security clearance and having contacts in the DoD? Guess.

Go on now, that black church ain't gonna bomb itself. Get to it, Warrior.

[emissaryscribe]

You know what's really great about holding a high level security clearance and having contacts in the DoD? Guess.

I sincerely hope this doesn't mean the Neosho Forums is just one more way to be connected to some government data base.

[Scutter]

No it isn't ES. Kay 9 was just doing a "Past Life Regression".

[kay9_medic]

I sincerely hope this doesn't mean the Neosho Forums is just one more way to be connected to some government data base.

Of course it is.

lets see here *tap tap tap tap ENTER*

I see the milk in your fridge is about to expire, and you're overdue on an oil change.

[archie bunker]

Revolution, you just picked a very bad day to go after Kay 9 again. Hear me well youngster, back off him and back off now.

But it is fine for Kay 9 to go after whoever he wants?

[kay9_medic]

But it is fine for Kay 9 to go after whoever he wants?

White supremacists are fair game, IMO.

Do you disagree, AB?

[archie bunker]

White supremacists are fair game, IMO.

Do you disagree, AB?

No I don't, but I looked back and there are very few you others that you have not attacked.

[kay9_medic]

No I don't, but I looked back and there are very few you others that you have not attacked.

Fair enough, it's a feedback thread.

I do dislike having a mark of "Fails to Play Well With Others" on my report card, so if you would answer a couple of questions for me so that I may modify my behavior to better suit your preference.


Part I

"By attack, I mean... " (circle one or more answers)

A) Reached through my monitor and poked me in the eye with a sharp stick.

B) Goes all Conan: crushes his enemies, see them driven before him, and hears the lamentation of their women.

C) Sends me running every day for the Prep H

D) Stalks me and I had to get a restraining order

E) Needled me, I didn't like that

F) Made a joke when I was being all like, serious

G) Other: (fill in)_______________________________________________ __


Part II

By "very few other's you have not [attacked]", do you mean

A) 1,000 or more

B) 100 or more

C) 10 or more

D) You, zziggy, "revolution", ML and possibly one or two others

[archie bunker]

Fair enough, it's a feedback thread.

I do dislike having a mark of "Fails to Play Well With Others" on my report card, so if you would answer a couple of questions for me so that I may modify my behavior to better suit your preference.


Part I

"By attack, I mean... " (circle one or more answers)

A) Reached through my monitor and poked me in the eye with a sharp stick.

B) Goes all Conan: crushes his enemies, see them driven before him, and hears the lamentation of their women.

C) Sends me running every day for the Prep H

D) Stalks me and I had to get a restraining order

E) Needled me, I didn't like that

F) Made a joke when I was being all like, serious

G) Other: (fill in)_______________________________________________ __


Part II

By "very few other's you have not [attacked]", do you mean

A) 1,000 or more

B) 100 or more

C) 10 or more

D) You, zziggy, "revolution", ML and possibly one or two others

G: all of the above
d:

[kay9_medic]

G: all of the above
d:

Well, I have been known to get a little carried away now and then.

Allow me offer my sincerest and heartfelt apologies and invite you to the Neosho Square to observe me paying well-deserved penance for my crimes, and if you wish, to pelt me with rotten fruit.

.

[kay9_medic]

At the risk of being assumed a “bot”, I’m going to quote myself again….

We are going to aerosolise your emo angst and sell it to the Chinese as a weapon.

We predict that your weapons grade repetitive whining will cover eighty percent of the cost of bandwidth for the next fiscal year.

.

[kay9_medic]

OUCH, snippity snippity SNAP!

You pwned me right in the face with one of my own mesmerizing graphicals, and laid the coup de grâce on me with a righteous haymaker to Nancy Pelosi in a site feedback thread!

You are amazing! Well played, sir. Very well played.